In a startling revelation on “Meet the Press,” MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell pinpointed a severe hitch in Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign—she’s apparently not hitting it off with male voters, both white and black. But here’s the kicker: Mitchell blames “misogynation” for this. Ain’t that a convenient scapegoat?

Is Competence No Longer Key?

Let’s cut to the chase: When did the measure of a candidate shift from competence to the constant drumming of identity politics? Kamala Harris, as the Vice President, should theoretically be a shoe-in with her experience. Yet, here we are, 72 days since she became the Democratic nominee and not a single press conference to boast about. Huh? Could it be that male voters are seeing past the veneer and questioning her actual achievements and leadership chops? Maybe they’re just not convinced she has what it takes to lead, which, last time I checked, was a pretty fair yardstick in politics.

Misogyny or Just a Smokescreen?

Calling out misogyny sounds like a solid defense until you realize it’s being used as a shield against all forms of critique. Mitchell mentions misogyny as a sweeping reason why Harris is struggling with male voters, but one must ponder: is this truly about gender, or is this just a handy excuse to divert attention from lackluster campaign strategies or vague economic policies? If every critique is deflected as misogyny, when do we actually get to the real issues voters care about?

Media Bias Unchecked

Mitchell also noted that Trump’s support among men could be underestimated. Given the media’s past track record, it’s no shocker that the support for a former President, who still wields considerable influence, is being downplayed. Perhaps there’s more than meets the eye, with the media possibly ignoring or underestimating the silent majority that feels alienated by the current political discourse focused more on identity than substance.

Out of Touch or Just Out of Options?

Harris’s latest tactical shift to more media appearances might seem like a step in the right direction. But choosing platforms like The View, The Howard Stern Show, and The Late Show with Stephen Colbert? That move might resonate more if the goal was to charm a late-night TV audience rather than serious voters grappling with economic worries and national security issues. This ain’t your typical voter’s choice for deep political insight.

In wrapping up, it’s crucial to ask ourselves whether we’re witnessing a genuine disconnect fueled by outdated attitudes towards a female candidate, or a strategic misfire by a campaign failing to address the electorate’s pressing concerns. Whatever the case, Harris’s road to winning over the male vote seems to be fraught with more than just accusations of misogyny—it’s about whether she can truly convince the electorate that she’s the heavyweight they need. Ain’t that obvious?